incheon framework for action
incheon framework for action - --- - الصفحة ٥
| ١٥. | Percentage of youth/ adults | Yes | X | X | X | Yes | c٣٠ | Yes | Currently data are only | |
| participating in education | available on adult education | |||||||||
| and training in the last | in European Union countries. | |||||||||
| ١٢ months, by type of | Considerable work is required | |||||||||
| programme (formal and non- | to develop a set of questions | |||||||||
| formal) and by age group | to be applied in labour force | |||||||||
| or other surveys globally. | ||||||||||
| The indicator will be | ||||||||||
| calculated for a range of age- | ||||||||||
| groups and for different types | ||||||||||
| of formal and non-formal | ||||||||||
| programmes, including adult | ||||||||||
| learning. | ||||||||||
| ٤.٤ By ٢٠٣٠, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and | ||||||||||
| vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship | ||||||||||
| Skills | ١٦. | ١. Percentage of youth/adults | Yes | X | X | X | ١-٣ | … | Few surveys (e.g. ICILS) | |
| who have achieved at least a | years | attempt to measure such | ||||||||
| minimum level of proficiency | skills. Major efforts are | |||||||||
| in digital literacy skills | required to develop global | |||||||||
| data collection. | ||||||||||
| ٢. Percentage of individuals | Yes | X | X | X | ١-٣ | … | Yes | The proposed global indicator | ||
| with ICT skills by type of skill | years | will be derived from ITU’s | ||||||||
| survey (and also possibly from | ||||||||||
| OECD). | ||||||||||
| ١٧. | Youth/adult educational | Yes | X | X | ? | Yes | c١٢٠ | |||
| attainment rates by age | ||||||||||
| group, economic activity | ||||||||||
| status, levels of education | ||||||||||
| and programme orientation | ||||||||||
٤.٥ By ٢٠٣٠, eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, and children in vulnerable situations
| Equity | … | Parity indices (female/male, | Yes | Alternative indicators include: | ||||||
| cross-targets | rural/urban, bottom/top | (i) odds ratio; (ii) concentration | ||||||||
| wealth quintile and others | index; or (iii) least advantaged | |||||||||
| such as disability status and | group (e.g. poorest rural girls) | |||||||||
| conflict-affected as data | relative to the mean. | |||||||||
| become available) for all | ||||||||||
| indicators on this list that can | ||||||||||
| be disaggregated (identified | ||||||||||
| in Columns ٤-٧) | ||||||||||
| Where possible, other | ||||||||||
| indicators should be | ||||||||||
| presented in relation to | ||||||||||
| their distribution across the | ||||||||||
| population | ||||||||||
| Policy | ١٨. | Percentage of students in | Yes | X | X | X | ٣-٥ | Measures of home language | ||
| primary education whose | years | and language of instruction | ||||||||
| first or home language is the | will be required to develop a | |||||||||
| language of instruction | global measurement tool. | |||||||||
| ١٩. | Extent to which explicit | No | ٣-٥ | A framework will be required | ||||||
| formula-based policies | years | in order for country policies to | ||||||||
| reallocate education | be described and assessed. | |||||||||
| resources to disadvantaged | ||||||||||
| populations | ||||||||||
| ٢٠. | Education expenditure per | No | ١-٣ | The coverage of this indicator, | ||||||
| student by level of education | years | especially for private | ||||||||
| and source of funding | education expenditure, needs | |||||||||
| to be expanded significantly. | ||||||||||
| ٢١. | Percentage of total aid to | No | Yes | c٦٠ | ||||||
| education allocated to low | ||||||||||
| income countries |